I have been considering adding something like the following to the Ion3 license. If it is against the DFSG, well, the effect still be the intended.
---
This work, "Ion3", is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), reproduced below, extended with the following"Distributor timely response clause" (D).
D. Anyone distributing Ion3 in aggregate with other works, must within twenty-eight (28) days from the release of a new version of Ion3, either (A) upgrade the aggregate to include the new version, and cause the new version be installed when a user tries to install an unspecified version of Ion3, or upgrade Ion3 (from the aggregate); or (B) remove Ion3 from the aggregate, and notify users of the removal, when they try to upgrade the aggregate or Ion3 (from the aggregate) and have installed an old version of Ion3. (It is, however, not necessary to remove Ion3 from the user's computer; merely notify of its out-datedness.)
The requirements above on responses to user actions do not apply, if the user is not network-connected, or chooses to not use network upgrades, and is using physical distribution media.
This clause does not bind any rebranded derivative works, that can not be confused with Ion3: that is, any derivative work whose name can not be confused with "Ion3", and whose listed maintainer (in the README) is different from that of Ion3, may be distributed under the LGPL or GPL without this clause.
Durch URS wurde ich auf den Debian-Bugreport #413469 ion3: The package is outdated aufmerksam gemacht. Darin beschwert sich Tumov, der Programmierer hinter ion3, darüber, dass in Debian Stable eine veraltete Development-Version von ion3 enthalten ist, die doch bitte entfernt/geupdatet werden soll. Zwischenzeitlich überlegt er sogar, seine Lizenz um etwas wie das folgende zu erweitern: